Keyword: «anthroponyms»

The article considers the Narym (Southern) Selkups historical anthroponimics, the ways of forming their names and borrowing names from neighboring peoples, ethnoanthroponyms. It presents the etymological analysis of the names.

The Evenki anthroponymic system is connected with the Evenki worldview and is reconstructed in the toponymy of the region. Evenks of Southern Yakutia, as well as Bury-atia, still retain adherence to traditional beliefs. The aim of this article is to preserve the semantic meaning of toponyms of Evenki origin. The research should result in the etymo-logical study of toponyms of Evenki origin, creation of reference books for normative word usage in the process of everyday communication of Evenks.

Non-calendar names used in the Solovetsky Monastery's income and expenditure records are examined within the compositional structure of anthroponyms. They serve, on the one hand, as a method of naming individuals in 16th-century Rus', contrasted with the calendar naming system that became common in anthroponymic usage in the late 10th century. They also serve as names that reflect significant linguistic and cultural information about the social status of individuals interacting with the monastery's treasury, the breadth of the Solovetsky Monastery's geographic reach, and its everyday life. The informative value of non-calendar names is determined by identifying the motivating features underlying these anthroponyms. Names with singular, dual, and multiple motivations are identified. Anthroponyms with implicit motivations are highlighted separately and require further, more detailed analysis.