Keyword: «evidence»

The article reveals the essence of the procedure applied in accordance with the legislation in force of the inquiry in the general order, points out shortcomings of the author’s appearance of this form of investigation of crimes. The grounds and conditions for conducting an inquiry are analyzed in a shortened form and its differences from the ordinary form of inquiry. Some provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law regulating the investigation of crimes in the shortened form of inquiry are criticized.

The article discusses the actual problems of using the results of operational investigative activities in the investigation of crimes. An analysis of the legislation on this issue has been carried out. Special attention is paid to the problems of legalizing the results of operational investigative measures within the framework of procedural evidence in a criminal case. The author proposes to fix the provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation recognizing the results of operational investigative activities as evidence in the procedural field.

The article is devoted to the study of the subject and limits of evidence in criminal proceedings, their role in establishing the truth and ensuring the fairness of judicial proceedings. The main approaches to determining the subject and limits of evidence are considered, the controversial points of view of the authors are analyzed, as well as the regulatory framework governing the evidentiary process. Special attention is paid to the problems that arise in the practice of using these categories, and possible solutions are proposed.

The presented article examines the problem of assessing the sufficiency of evidence, emphasizing the lack of legislative specification of this category.