Keyword: «preliminary investigation»

The article is devoted to the organization of the preliminary investigation

The judicial investigator is considered as one of the main institutions of the Judicial reform of 1864. The distinction between the concepts of «judicial investigator» and «investigating judge» is carried out. The conclusion is justified that it would not be advisable to introduce into modern criminal proceedings the institution of an investigating judge, with the power to supervise the preliminary investigation.

This article is a deep and comprehensive analysis of judicial review as a method of protecting constitutional rights at pre-trial stages. The author of the article analyzes the main aspects of judicial review, including its legal basis, principles and mechanisms of implementation. Particular attention is paid to the practical application of judicial review in criminal proceedings, as well as its impact on the effectiveness of protecting the constitutional rights of citizens.

In the modern world, where the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies plays a key role in ensuring security and order in society, the relevance of the implementation of the prosecution function by the preliminary investigation bodies cannot be overestimated. The article is devoted to a deep analysis of the functions of the investigator in domestic criminal proceedings, focusing on their versatility and interaction with the procedural status of this official. The study is supported by extensive citations of scientific works by leading experts in the field of criminal proceedings. In conclusion, the article proposes a set of measures to improve the system of functions of the investigator, aimed at strengthening human rights guarantees and improving the quality of preliminary investigation in the context of modern legal reality.