Keyword: «"revelatory")»

The paper (based on the correlation of the volume of the concepts "theology", "natural theology", "philosophical theology") unfolds the position, according to which "natural theology" is a kind of "philosophical theology" (different from the "theology of revealed"), under which the results of the scientific study of nature is interpreted as evidence for the existence of its Creator. As a result, consideration of the major milestones of "natural theology" makes explicit the following contradiction. The same religious tenets, which are part of the natural theology of modern times justified by an appeal to the central principles of mechanistic CCM in natural theology Newest time began to settle by using modern scientific data (e.g., the anthropic principle as the one of the central ideas of modern cosmology). Those. as evidence of the same religion claims used and characteristic of classical science, the image of the universe as a "perfectly precise mechanism", and the denial of science in such a way postnonclassical (one of the central ideas of which is the global / universal evolutionism). This contradiction allows us to estimate the natural theology is not as fruitful attempt of dialogue between science and religion (which must lie on a different plane than attempt to prove the dogmas of the last reference to the data of the first), but as appealing to Heisenberg, their "mixing" and mutual "dissolution".