Keyword: «armed conflict»

In article the analysis and synthesis of experience of use of domestic Armed Forces of the USSR and the Russian Federation in internal regional armed conflicts is carried out. Questions of application of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in fight against the international terrorism, performance of peacekeeping operations by Russia in the former Soviet Union are considered. The carried-out analysis of scientific literature has shown that the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation used the Armed forces in the territory of the USSR and the former Soviet Union in armed conflicts and conflict situations during global changes in the socio-political, ideological and economic sphere before and after the collapse of the USSR for the purpose of restoration of the constitutional legality and law and order, prevention of disintegration of the state.

Wars were always started by politicians with the help of financial means and equipment, and ordinary soldiers finished. But a good soldier still needs to be called, dressed, fed, trained, armed, motivated to win and throw into battle. In this regard, mobilization and its entire system on a state scale remains very relevant in the modern age of nuclear and hypersonic technologies. A victory in the war bring ordinary people who need to provide everything necessary. In the article, on the basis of the above, the system of recruitment and training of specialists of the intendant service, within the mobilization company of the Russian-Japanese war of 1904-1905 is considered.

The armed conflict between Hamas and Israel that arose in October 2023 vividly demonstrated the complete, explicit and final rejection by the parties of the norms of international humanitarian law, the laws and customs of war. At the same time, the UN, other international organizations and some countries condemning "disproportionate violence" are forced to confine themselves to the declaration, since currently there are no forces, means and international structures in the world that allow curbing terrorism and war crimes. The above clearly demonstrates the final crisis of the system of international humanitarian law. The current situation is the quintessence of insurmountable contradictions between two world civilizational models – the Sea and the Land, which then turned into an irreconcilable struggle between the West and the East, which are personified by the USA and the USSR (RF).In our opinion, the current Middle East conflict is the beginning of the collapse of the civilization of the Sea (West) = USA and Land Victories (USSR-RF). We have yet to see a new Yalta and Karlhorst, a new Nuremberg trial (over the USA, Israel, Great Britain and Ukraine) and the formation of a new system of international humanitarian law based on an updated or new UN.