Keyword: «author»

The article explores ways of implementing Leo Tolstoy’s value orientations in relation to the content and meaning of human life via the prism of a chronotopic solution. Leo Tolstoy’s special attention to the categories of “time” and space " as natural forms of human existence entails a special spatial and temporal embodiment of the author’s concept of the value and essence of human life, deepened by philosophical images and symbols.

The article analyzes the need to distinguish at the legislative level such results of intellectual activity as software and software for computers, as well as the consolidation of software as a modern object of civil rights, This is due to the rapid development of society and the emergence of new intellectual property products that require self-protection.

The article examines about the demand for literary studies of the highlighted problem as the concept of the unity of man and nature in Russian literature of the 20th century.The novelty of the content of the work lies in the comparative analysis of literary texts by the classics of modern prose G. Troepolsky and the Yakut writer N. Luginov.Based on existing literary criticism about the work of the classics of multinational literature of Russia A. Burtsev, Т. Permyakova and others. It should be noted that the authors set a goal: to identify the text-forming role of the image of a dog in the poetics of stories. Also, a review of criticism shows that Nikolai Luginov’s work in comparative terms with G. Troepolsky’s story was practically not considered independently in the context of the literary archetype of a dog.