Keyword: «civil law»

The article examines the problems and prospects of the development of the institution of ownership in Russian law, considering foreign experience. The current civil, land, and housing legislation is analyzed, as well as judicial practice on the protection of ownership and the statute of limitations. It is proved that the lack of a legal definition of ownership in Russian legislation and a clear system of its types creates doctrinal and law enforcement difficulties. Based on a comparison with the German and Dutch models, directions for improving Russian legislation are proposed, including the normative consolidation of the general concept of ownership and clarifying the rules on joining the limitation periods of ownership. The conclusion is made about the need for a systematic registration of ownership as an independent institution of private law.

Within the framework of modern legal doctrine and practice, civil law is a complex system that regulates property and personal non-property relations. Civil law objects play a key role in this system, as they are the subject of legal influence and determine the content and scope of the rights and obligations of the subjects. However, despite the significant achievements in the field of legal regulation of civil law objects, there are a number of problems that require comprehensive analysis and effective solutions. Firstly, it is necessary to take into account the dynamic development of economic relations and scientific and technological progress, which leads to the emergence of new types of objects that require adequate legal regulation. Secondly, the existing legal framework does not always meet modern requirements, which necessitates its modernization and adaptation.