RU

Keyword: «prevention of corruption»

In the article, in the aspect of comparative legal research, the main directions of combating corruption in the civil service in foreign countries are considered. The basic legislative acts, activities of state bodies and officials, forms and methods of combating and preventing corruption in the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the people's Republic of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Norway are analyzed. In these States, the characteristic features, approaches and mechanisms in the state legal regulation in this area, which may be useful for Russia, are highlighted.
The article examines the state and legal institutions of combating corruption in the field of public service in foreign countries in the aspect of comparative legal research. We analyze the methods and forms used by the legislative, executive and judicial authorities in the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Norway. The conclusions about the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures and their relationship with the status of public service in countries with different models of interaction between law enforcement agencies and society are substantiated.
The article discusses the problems of preventing corruption in educational organizations in relation to students. The most popular and effective system of Modern Russian state anti-corruption policy involves assessing corruption risks and applying corruption prevention measures that are adequate for various categories of citizens. measures to prevent corruption in this area is legal and anti-corruption education. The advantage for organizing the prevention of corruption in the student environment is the organization of students, the direct requirements of the legislator for the formation (exploration) of competencies that ensure citizens’ compliance with legal norms and the implementation of an active civic position of rejection of corrupt behavior. The study assessed legal, organizational, methodological and psychological problems. The experience of teaching the training course “Anti-Corruption” and the practice of organizing supervisory work in study groups at the Siberian Institute of Management, a branch of RANEPA, are presented.
The article examines the main problems associated with the prevention, detection, disclosure and suppression of corruption offenses, and also examines modern methods of combating corruption.