Keyword: «administrative responsibility»

On the basis of analysis of legal acts are considered aspects of the organization of work to collect administrative fines and administrative liability of persons who evade payment thereof, under Part 1 of Art. 20.25 of the Administrative Code.

The paper analyses the use of the administrative coercive measures to minors and their legal representatives. The authors reveal the problems of application of these measures and suggest ways to improve legislation.

The article reveals such problems as interaction of customs services of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union when legal entities are brought to administrative responsibility for offenses in the sphere of customs.

The article deals with the problem of conflict of law norms of two federal laws: Article 1 of the Federal Law "On Counteracting Extremist Activity" and Article 20.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. In the first law, "propaganda and public demonstration of Nazi attributes" are referred to extremist activity, and Part 1 of Article 20.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation establishes administrative responsibility "for propaganda or public demonstration of Nazi attributes." The author of the publication analyzes how this collision affects law enforcement practice, as the hypothesis of Part 1 of Article 20.3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation is consistent with Article 29 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which guarantees the right to freedom of speech and thoughts.

The article examines and compares the legal issues of application of administrative responsibility for environmental offenses in Finland and the Russian Federation, The regulation of administrative liability for environmental offenses both in Russia and in Finland is based on the definition of actual damage, which is reflected in the costs of eliminating the harmful consequences of the offender's activities, which agrees with international laws, in particular, with the recommendations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Within this context the methods of compensation for environmental damage and the effect of the environmental insurance provided by laws, the process of exercising environmental control, as well as the administrative justice system of Finland, the structure and activities of administrative courts are subject to comparison. The research was carried out on the basis of materials from such sources as the Federal Law of the Russian Federation "On Environmental Protection", the Code on Administrative Proceedings, the Finnish Laws "On Nature Protection", "On Environmental Damage Insurance" and "On Administrative Procedure", as well as other regulatory acts of Russia and Finland, which regulate the application of administrative responsibility for environmental violations and issues of environmental insurance.