Keyword: «legal regulation»

The article discusses some comparative legal aspects related to the formation and development of Russian legislation and the legislation of the European Union on artificial intelligence. The main risks and threats associated with the introduction of digital technologies into real civil circulation are analyzed. Special attention is paid to comparative law a comparative legal analysis of the key provisions of the Russian «Code of Ethics in the Field of Artificial Intelligence» with its European counterpart – the «Code of Ethics for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence» is given. It is noted that the Russian Code stipulates that it applies to legal relations related to the ethical aspects of the creation (design, construction, piloting), implementation and use of AI technologies at all stages of the life cycle, which are currently practically not regulated by the legislation of the Russian Federation and/or acts of technical regulation. It is concluded that the adoption of the «Code of Ethics of AI» should be evaluated positively, since it can become a «filter» of digital security for the Russian Federation and ensure the sustainable development of both civil turnover and society as a whole.

The scientific work reveals aspects of the deliberate dissemination of false information in social networks. The author considers the legal experience of regulation in Russia and some foreign countries. The work reveals the features of legal responsibility in various jurisdictions.

This chapter of the monograph considers such special means of legal technique as legal presumptions and axioms. As social regulators, they are a variety of rules that complement legal norms and help to overcome the most difficult situations in legal regulation, as well as to overcome conflicts in law-making and law enforcement. The chapter focuses on the theoretical and legal emphasis and the reflection of legal presumptions and axioms in Russian legislation and legal practice. The opinions of legal scholars, examples from practice and legislation are given. It is concluded that legal presumptions and axioms, with seeming similarity, are different in their content and purpose mechanisms that are used by legal techniques for the qualitative regulation of various social relations.

This chapter of the monograph considers the legal fiction as a special means of legal technique from the standpoint of law-making and law enforcement. The article studies theoretical and legal aspects of fiction as a legal category, its application in the material and procedural law, manifestations in modern Russian legislation and legal practice. In conclusion, it is justified to distinguish legal fiction from related phenomena, such as legal presumptions and axioms.

The article is devoted to the legal foundations of the formation and definition of the concept of urban improvement.