RU

Keyword: «public service»

The article examines the state and legal institutions of combating corruption in the field of public service in foreign countries in the aspect of comparative legal research. We analyze the methods and forms used by the legislative, executive and judicial authorities in the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Norway. The conclusions about the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures and their relationship with the status of public service in countries with different models of interaction between law enforcement agencies and society are substantiated.
The article is dedicated to identifying problems and improving modern personnel policy in government authorities using the example of Rostov-on-Don.
The article examines the concept of state service as a legal category in the Russian Federation. The legal definition enshrined in Federal Law No. 210-FZ is analyzed, and its formal legal advantages and disadvantages are identified. Based on the critical analysis of doctrinal approaches, the content boundaries of the concept and the correlation of state service with related categories (“public service”, “administrative service”, “state function”) are explored. The features of state service are distinguished, and multidimensional classifications (by level of authority, form of provision, degree of compulsion, etc.) are proposed. The intersectoral nature of the institute is substantiated, and the evolution of legislative regulation from formal definition to substantive content, including the introduction of proactive service provision, is traced.