Natalya Danilova

The authors consider actual theoretical issues of regulating the institution of land acquisition for government or municipal needs. They examine the problems caused by the gaps in legal regulation. One can pick out among them the absence of a legislatively established definition of state or municipal needs, the lack of fixed legal responsibility of authorized bodies for the use of acquired land plots contrary to the stated goals, the lack of the possibility to cancel the decision on acquisition and reverse the implementation of such a decision, the lack of obligation to pay compensation to users of residential premises located on acquired land plots. In addition, they discuss such problems as an open list of grounds for land acquisition and the ambiguous prioritization of legislation regulating public affairs related to land acquisition for state or municipal needs. As a result of the study, the authors propose a solution to these problems by making certain adjustments to the law.

The article discusses the issue of the independence of family law liability. It analyzes the position of scientists on this issue, the ratio of the concepts of protection measures and measures of responsibility. The concept of family law liability is framed.

Rational use of lands and their protection depend to a large extent on the effectiveness of control and supervisory work, which is an important element of the mechanism for ensuring law and order in this area. Statistics show a large number of land legislation violations, and therefore there is a need to establish an effective system of government land supervision. Thus, the improvement of government land supervision should be one of the key areas of state policy concerning land management. It should be noted that the control and supervisory functions in the field of land affairs have undergone significant legislative changes recently. A risk-based approach has been used in implementing government land supervision since 2018. This article is devoted to the implementation of government land supervision issues with the use of a risk-based approach. The authors analyzed the criteria for assigning risk categories, worked out the proposals for improving government land supervision.

The article is the result of summarizing the materials of judicial practice regarding the assignment of the right to lease a land plot that is in public ownership. We consider the problems that have arisen as a result of amending Article 448 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, in particular the problem of land and civil legislation competition.