Keyword: «guardianship»

The article is devoted to the questions, revealing the influence of family education on successful socialization of primary school students, the main aim of which is the formation of comprehensively and harmoniously developed person, capable to independent life in modern conditions.

The article analyzes the changes made to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation relating to the legal status of disabled and reduced mobility of citizens. The analysis of medical and legal criteria for disability and limited capacity of citizens. The need for a differentiated approach to the definition of disability and the limited capacity of persons suffering from mental illness.

This article deals with the care ship under minors. Finnish lawyers insist, that it encloses as parent’s troubles about their children as wardship and guardianship under minors, who were remaining (lifting) without their parents. The main criterion of such careship consists that in Finland usually it is the same relationship to children as to full-fledged human persons. Corporal punishments for children are forbidden in Finland, as coarse words and relationships, which degrade human self-respect (dignity). The guardian must submit all his activities on careship about health charging of such child and his breeding, education, physical and mental development and about his financial (material) welfare, with just the same child who is in the charge of this care man. The main bodies of establishing of careship are: social commissions of municipalities and municipal bureaucrats were authorized to guard the rights of children and also courts of first instance of General jurisdiction. A proper situation with the careship under miners in Finland may be given only when you are taking into your account the whole development of Finnish careship legislation for the last 40 years.

The institution of secrecy of adoption is one of the unique features of domestic family legislation, since it is not provided for in most foreign countries. For this reason, many authors pay close attention to how the secrecy of adoption affects law enforcement practice and the psychological state of adopted children. Hence, it is obvious that the institution under study has been the subject of discussions and debates among both theorists and practitioners for many years: in the scientific literature one can find directly opposite points of view regarding the validity of legislative provisions on the secrecy of adoption. Moreover, the institute is intersectoral and is considered both from the point of view of family law and from the position of civil and criminal law [7, P. 176]. In this regard, issues related to protecting the secrecy of adoption remain relevant today. In this article, the author examined Russian and foreign legislation, judicial practice, as well as scientific research and concepts on key issues of the secrecy of adoption. The arguments of opponents of the secrecy of adoption and the arguments of those authors who support the secrecy of adoption are analyzed. Based on the study, some problems of legal regulation are formulated, the currently formed law enforcement practice is analyzed, and recommendations are given for improving legislation in the area under study.