Keyword: «jargon»

This article describes the jargon of student subjects. Two sides of students ' speech are distinguished: academic speech and informal speech related to the functioning of General youth and student jargon. Thematic blocks related to the learning process at the University are identified, combining the names of various realities that are relevant to students. Specific examples are used to reveal the communicative and evaluative functions of jargon, as well as the nature of litters in dictionaries, which allow us to distinguish nominatively neutral and evaluative lexical units in the vocabulary of the production core of student jargon. The author motivates the need to know the lexical resources of social varieties of language, study the features of live speech for a comprehensive mastery of the Russian language.

The article deals with the problem of teenage slang. It is extremely relevant for many scientific areas: for age psychology, since the special language created by teenagers, which is a kind of pass into their world, is at the same time one of the reasons for misunderstanding between adolescents and adults; for linguistics, since adolescence is most characterized by a creative approach to life, and it is teenage slang that is currently one of the most interesting language subsystems. In the social aspect, teenage slang is a very interesting phenomenon. At its core, it is a code language that is the key to understanding the world of teenagers.

The article is devoted to modern student slang, which is an urgent problem in modern vocabulary. The study of students' slang is necessary to understand the colloquial speech of the younger generation.

The article examines the vocabulary of A. S. Griboyedov’s play “Woe from Wit” from the point of view of its sphere of use. Words from this classification are divided into words in common use and those limited by their sphere of use. The article examines in detail words from a limited scope of use in the play. Lexemes of a limited scope of use are professionalisms, dialectisms, and jargons. In addition, this work examines the role of the use of words with a limited scope of use in the play itself.

The article examines the vocabulary of a limited range of usage, namely argot, jargon and slang. It is noted that linguists ambiguously interpret these concepts in terms of content, which causes terminological disagreement. An analysis of the views of scientists on this problem from the point of view of the permissibility/inadmissibility of their use in colloquial and public speech has shown that they show loyalty to the use of these formations, explaining this by the fact that society currently perceives such vocabulary as a vernacular or as generally accepted words. Students studying in their native language use the vocabulary of criminal jargon in their colloquial speech, but rarely even when discussing, for example, a criminal situation or a feature film. But in their colloquial speech, student slang is actively used, which is organically connected with studying and living in a dormitory.