Keyword: «philosophy»

The economic discourse of the early Modern period offers an analysis of specific key phenomena: property, finance, commerce, trade, population growth and economic development, as well as studies of economic inequality and equity of distribution. Many of the leading philosophers of Modern times, from Nicolaus Copernicus to Adam Smith, have made huge contributions to economics. In the early Modern period, there were at least a dozen schools of economic thought. Impressively, by the end of the 18th century, many basic principles and laws relating to money, markets and trade had already been formulated and many of the methods of economics – model building, time series analysis, statistical estimation, game theory and decision theory – already existed.

The article is devoted to the key sources of the formation of philosophical thought in the lands of the northern Black Sea region in the VI–V centuries before the birth of Christ and their influence on the development of Slavic philosophy before Kievan Rus. The emphasis is placed on the connections of ancient philosophical thought with Slavic. The article highlights the ontological aspects of Proto-Slavic philosophy and their influence on the thinkers of that time

The article discusses the role of technology in changing a person’s lifestyle and thinking, analyzing the impact of artificial intelligence on labor and educational processes, and the impact of automation on human creativity and social relationships. Conclusions about possible negative consequences and ethical di-lemmas when introducing artificial intelligence are presented. Also identified are some ideologies and philo-sophical concepts that are focused on the perception of technological progress.

The article examines about the demand for literary studies of the highlighted problem as the concept of the unity of man and nature in Russian literature of the 20th century.The novelty of the content of the work lies in the comparative analysis of literary texts by the classics of modern prose G. Troepolsky and the Yakut writer N. Luginov.Based on existing literary criticism about the work of the classics of multinational literature of Russia A. Burtsev, Т. Permyakova and others. It should be noted that the authors set a goal: to identify the text-forming role of the image of a dog in the poetics of stories. Also, a review of criticism shows that Nikolai Luginov’s work in comparative terms with G. Troepolsky’s story was practically not considered independently in the context of the literary archetype of a dog.