Keyword: «philosophy»

The article is devoted to the topic of "traces of the past” interpretation; its relevance is due to both the need to improve the training of history majors and the aggravation of the fight against falsifications of history (primarily domestic). The aim of the research is to analyze the correlation of humanitarian, social and technological components in the methodology of teaching historical disciplines. The comparative method was chosen as a key method. The work uses the method of hypotheses, content analysis of the source base, and experience in studying University teaching practice. Identifying the prerequisites for «incorrect" interpretation of historical events, the author compares legal, forensic and philosophical approaches. The theoretical significance of the article lies in the novelty of an interdisciplinary, integrated technosocial humanitarian outlook on historical research. According to the author, the best way to overcome bias is adherence to principles; a person must inspire and justify trust: this requirement is true for both a forensic expert and a scientist. The main thing is to avoid simplifications, geometric sketching of the past, reducing it to parallels and piles of additional constructions, politicized speculations. No less great is the temptation to fall into exegesis, and from the interpreter of texts to become the owner of stylization and meta-history. The task of the researcher is to establish the specifics of the typical. It is extremely difficult to find the “median nerve” of an era, but this is the only way to “qualify the subjective side of an act” from a historiosophical perspective. The sensation and awareness of belonging to humanity obliges the scientist to think in integral, complex, figurative, and not abstract categories. Intersubjectivity itself (even intrasubjectivity) characterizes history as a humanitarian science, and not as narrowly social one (akin to jurisprudence or sociology, especially in their positivistic interpretations). The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that the material of the article can be used in the pedagogical process, and a comparison of fundamental and applied disciplines will help history majors to sort out professional and worldview issues, and teach them to distinguish between the eternal and the vain-trendy, the ideological and the tendentious. History, the author believes, is about the eternally alive, and not about the outdated things.

The problems of integration of law and artificial intelligence in a clash of civilizations are considered. The authors focus the attention of society on the need to develop new approaches to philosophical and social assessments of justice, truth, moral values, the dangers of scientific and technological progress and the development of uncontrolled human reason, the development of individual scientists in the field of artificial intelligence in a clash of civilizations.

In the article, the object of analysis is the Kazakh heroic epic. Philosophical reflection allows us to explore the epic from the perspective of its historical and logical development, ascent from the abstract to the concrete. The works of the heroic epic have entered the structure of Kazakh folklore and occupy a special place in it. The poetics of the heroic epic lies in the fact that in it discursive forms of thinking often give way to artistic and imaginative thinking.

The subject of analysis in this article is the position and role of social– humanitarian disciplines in a technical university. The authors pay attention to the fact that these disciplines play an important role in the scientist global-view and in the formation of general cultural competences. It is emphasized that the most important competencies are: to work in a team, to bear conscious and legal responsibility, readiness for self– development.

Consciousness is a special awareness of the human soul about the things that are really in it, represented and known; it is one of the areas of the human soul that creates and promotes knowledge, a way of knowing. In consciousness, a person simultaneously relates to the outside world and to himself. V.I. Dahl defines consciousness as normal human feelings, sanity, full memory, free will and the ability to account for their actions. Self-awareness is the awareness of one's presence in the world, the belief that the inner self is different from everything, is outside of me, i.e. one of a kind, uniquely different, unique.