Keyword: «risk group»

The article is about the problems of building of professional strengths of students (future social teacher), which help in the prophylactic treatment of drug-addicted young people. It was offered the social-pedagogical program for building the professional strengths of students (future social teacher), which help in the prophylactic treatment of drug-addicted young people. This program was used by social teacher dur-ing the academic year. It was determined it’s effectiveness.

Article deals with the problem of drug abuse and its prevention among adolescents. Proposed socio-pedagogical project drug prevention Juvenile, which is implemented by students-future social teachers in the process of socio-pedagogical practice, revealed its efficacy.

: the article considers the problem of professional training of students. The analysis of the state of modern education, identified one of the main tasks. Advantages of the system of continuous education " College – UNIVERSITY ". Identified all categories of children, including foster and ward, to buy a larger orientation in the range of the profession, confidence in their abilities. It is proved that the focus of the learning process on the humanization of professional training contributes to the formation of the personality of the adolescent "at risk".

The article describes the differentiated approach in the prevention of speech disorders in children at an early age. The authors give a description of children with risk factors for alalia, dysarthria and stammering. They also present comparative indicators of the objective activity, communication and procedural games formation level.

The relevance of the article lies in clarifying and concretizing the content of the concept of «psychological security of the educational environment» taking into account new challenges and threats with an emphasis on the personal factor. It is shown that the definition of psychological security of the educational environment through the category of protection from various risks and threats does not meet new challenges and threats. The authors believe that in the modern digital world, combining real and virtual influence on children and young people, it is not possible to fully foresee all imaginable dangers and protect students from them, because even identical conditions for one student may be safe, for another – constitute a potential threat. The authors emphasize that the educational environment is characterized by dynamism, and its psychological security as an integrated part is based primarily on the ability of the subjects themselves to maintain stability, vigilance, show critical thinking, resist negative influences and overcome them on their own or by seeking help. The aim of the study was to examine the personal characteristics of modern students which can influence the psychological safety of the educational environment in a situation of new challenges and threats. The following personal qualities of students were studied: conformism, social pessimism, intolerance, nihilism, cynicism, destructiveness, attitude to the permissibility of aggression, the presence of a cult of strength, protest activity, etc. To do this, the multidimensional diagnostic technique by D.G. Davydov and K.D. Khlomov was used. According to the results of the work done, the personal characteristics of students that form the potential risks of both illegal activity and loyalty to its implementation on the part of other persons are revealed: social conformity, unwillingness to make independent decisions and take personal responsibility, a tendency to simplify the picture of the world, reduce complex parameters of the VUCA world to generalized models, attraction to idealized guarantees of social justice. The novelty lies in identifying the targets of socio-psychological work with students aimed at reducing the risks to the psychological safety of the educational environment. The results of the research can be used by the administration, university teachers, tutors of student groups, psychologists to organize educational, correctional, preventive work with students, as well as for psychological and pedagogical support of students, taking into account their individual characteristics at the stage of their personal development at the university.