RU

Keyword: «anti-corruption»

In the article, in the aspect of comparative legal research, the main directions of combating corruption in the civil service in foreign countries are considered. The basic legislative acts, activities of state bodies and officials, forms and methods of combating and preventing corruption in the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the people's Republic of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Norway are analyzed. In these States, the characteristic features, approaches and mechanisms in the state legal regulation in this area, which may be useful for Russia, are highlighted.
The article is aimed at revealing the problem of administrative anti-corruption regulations in the Russian Federation, arising from the complexity and scale of the phenomenon as well as the threat that corruption poses to the state’s national security. The authors investigate the problem in terms of administrative and legal anti-corruption mechanisms and focus their attention on the provisions of the administrative legislation in the Russian Federation, first and foremost, taking into consideration the Code of Administrative Offenses. The article analyzes administrative and legal approaches to the concept of an administrative offense involving corruption. By compiling law enforcement and judicial practices the authors make proposals for improving articles 19.28 and 19.29 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation. Administrative and legal ways of fighting corruption in the Russian society are also proposed.
The article examines the state and legal institutions of combating corruption in the field of public service in foreign countries in the aspect of comparative legal research. We analyze the methods and forms used by the legislative, executive and judicial authorities in the French Republic, the Federal Republic of Germany, the People's Republic of China, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Kingdom of Norway. The conclusions about the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures and their relationship with the status of public service in countries with different models of interaction between law enforcement agencies and society are substantiated.
The article is devoted to the study of the problem of combating corruption as a systemic phenomenon. The economic damage inflicted on society by corruption schemes is substantiated on the basis of specific facts. The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) in the international rating «Transparency International» for 2019 for Russia is given. In order to study the role of prevention of corruption offenses, an overview of the main directions and measures of punishment in the Russian Federation for acts of corruption is presented.
The article examines the current problems of the Russian Federation in the field of corruption crimes committed, in particular, in the customs authorities. The influence of coronavirus on the level of corruption has been studied, the causes and methods of committing acts of corruption have been analyzed, as well as the main types of corruption manifestations have been considered and ways to combat them have been proposed.