Keyword: «president»

The paper is devoted to features of modern interaction of institutes of the president and government in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Korea. The research is made with use of a number of factors which served as criteria in carrying out the analysis.

In this paper, based on the analysis of numerous statistical data analysis is made of small and medium-sized businesses Tula region at the present stage.

This article explores in detail the form of government of the Republic of South Ossetia. The author attributes South Ossetia to the category of "disputed states". By analyzing the provisions of the Constitution, it is concluded that the form of government of this state is atypical. In addition, the form of government of South Ossetia is compared with the form of government of the "patron" of this state – the Russian Federation. A conclusion is made about the similarity of the forms of government of the two states.

The presidential republic is historically the first form of the republic in which the president is the head of state. It still dominates the republican form of government. The homeland of the presidential republic was the United States of America, which in 1787 consolidated this form of government in its Constitution. Many nations followed their path, but in fact, no other country in the world succeeded in the presidential republic transplantation. Attempts to establish it everywhere ended in the establishment of some form of dictatorship and hypertrophied authorities of the state head.

The United States of America became the birthplace of the classical presidential Republic. The war for independence clearly showed the rebellious colonists that the country desperately needed its own strong head of state, who should be the head of the executive power, and the fear of a possible “tyranny of assembly” led to the rejection of traditional British parliamentarism. The need to create an effective system of checks and balances realized by them led not only to the emergence of an independent judiciary, but also to the real possibilities of each federal branch of power to exercise not only their own powers, but also, depending on the situation, to neutralize the attempts of other branches of power to go beyond the constitutional authority and usurp state power.