Keyword: «interpersonal relations»

In this article definitions of a gender, gender identity, girls – representatives of subculture "tomboy" are considered. The short review of views of various authors of a gender and gender identity, and the interpersonal relations, and also the analysis of articles on similar subject. The purpose, tasks, a hypothesis, a subject, object of this theoretical research are described

The problem of communicative competence of senior preschoolers is analyzed in the article. It presents the results of empirical study of the cognitive complexity connection in the sphere of interpersonal perception among older preschool children with their social status and characteristics of interpersonal relations with other children and adults.

In article specific features of manifestation of a self-assessment at younger school age, her types are considered: the adequate self-assessment overestimated, underestimated. The author notes that now more and more visible effect of a self-assessment of the younger school student on his behavior, interpersonal contacts. In order that the child felt happy, was capable to adapt and overcome better difficulties, he needs to have a positive idea of himself, an adequate self-assessment.

The article deals with the peculiarities of interpersonal interaction of children having speech pathology with their peers. We identified three models of interaction. The first model is characterized as normative. The second and third models are considered as non-normative. They are associated with manifestations of excessive compliance or aggression. The article notes that the formation of compliant and aggressive interaction with peers occurs under the influence of speech pathology, when the social and communicative development of the child is significantly complicated.

One of the most relevant professional skills today is the ability to work in a team. It should be recognized that the high effectiveness of this work, common incentives, motivations do not arise spontaneously. These are manifestations of the personal potential of its members, a complex of qualities, abilities and skills belonging to individual team members. The aim of the article is to study the personal quality of “initiative” among students of the pedagogical university who are engaged in team activities. The authors studied semantic and substantive essential characteristics of initiative, its structure, specific features. Considerable attention is paid to the analysis of various theories of the teamwork organization, both by foreign and domestic researchers, which cover a wide range of team building issues. Particular attention is paid to revealing social, socio-psychological, pedagogical, administrative and organizational, rational-organizational, administrative-organizational and virtual aspects of teamwork. The authors described a number of specific features of this type of activity: qualitative nature of interpersonal interactions in a group; duality, contradiction of wishes; distinctive national character of the group, manifested in a common, collective team spirit. Based on the analysis of “initiative” concept, its constituent components are identified: motivational-volitional, procedural-activity, and reflexive-evaluative ones. As a result of the study, the authors found out that acquiring effective teamwork skills contribute to the positive socialization of participants and to the formation of universal competences “Teamwork and leadership” according to FSES HE 44.03.01 Pedagogical Education and 44.03.05 Pedagogical Education (with two areas of training). Case technology and project technology in their harmonious combination were those to evaluate the level of initiative establishment. The presentation of theoretical material at the lessons in the case form and the public defense of its project decision allowed all team members to take initiative in varying degrees, which revealed the abilities and needs of the participant’s personality and the level of the team formation in general. The article may be interesting for teachers, specialists in the field of team building, those who work in the field of additional education, curators of student groups, class tutors.